Wednesday, May 12, 2010

SIGN the Condemnation of the anti-LGBTI "Manhattan Declaration"

On November 20, 2009, the Manhattan Declaration -- drafted by Chuck Colson of Watergate infamy, and Robert George of the antigay National Organization for Marriage -- was released. The document was signed by Orthodox, Roman Catholic and evangelical Protestant leaders who have been outspoken in their opposition to gay rights, same-sex marriage and abortion rights for women. Seeking to replace the US Constitution with right-wing religious dogma, the declaration also tries to commandeer the legacy of Martin Luther King to serve bigotry, intolerance and discrimination.

We believe that the Manhattan Declaration is dangerous because it attempts to legitimize and enshrine bigotry and needs to be vigorously confronted and refuted. We have therefore written a counter declaration and ask you to do three things: read it, sign it, and solicit your friends to do likewise.

We make a special appeal to people of faith to speak out against hatred masked as righteousness and to come to the defense of women and Lesbian, Gay, Transgender, Bisexual and Intersex people. We ask you to affirm the separation of church and state and to help reclaim the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr.


" MANHATTAN DECLARATION "

CONDEMNATION AND WATCH

We the undersigned stand implacably opposed to the following: the hatred of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) people; violations of the separation of church and state; discriminatory attacks upon abortion rights and upon the rights of transgender and intersex people to own and control their bodies; and attempts to hijack the legacy of Martin Luther King and other Civil Rights heroes to serve bigotry and discrimination.

OPPOSITION TO EQUAL RIGHTS IS BIGOTRY

Right-wing Christian church leaders are seeking to impose a narrow set of religious dogmas on the rest of our society.

The latest salvo in their mean-spirited crusade is the Manhattan Declaration, a call to destroy civil rights' protections for LGBT Americans and end abortion rights for women. They would impose a narrow "Judeo-Christian" bias on civil society, and they have the chutzpah to wrap themselves in the mantle of Martin Luther King, who opposed unjust laws through civil disobedience.

We the undersigned hereby adopt a counter declaration of principles, one that rejects all homophobic and transphobic intrusions into the lives of LGBT people and efforts by the state or anyone else to control our bodies. We invite our readers, if you are of like mind and no matter what your sexual affections, to sign our declaration as well.

Our nation has a diverse society that includes millions of LGBT inhabitants. We will NOT tolerate discrimination and hate masked as religious rhetoric; this is bigotry masquerading as righteousness. Just as we are not silent when bigotry and discrimination thunders from the political podium, so, unlike many LGBT "leaders," we do not shrink from condemning the same bigotry and discrimination when they hide behind stained glass windows, priestly robes, and the pulpit.

We reject the shopworn tactic of bigoted Christians employing Biblical passages to justify discrimination against LGBT people while at the same time decrying any angry opposition from its victims as an attack on their so-called "religious freedom." There is no Constitutionally-protected "freedom to discriminate" against gays any more than there is to discriminate against African Americans, women, or Jews.

Civil rights belong to everyone. Rest assured, we will meet all efforts wherever they are made to roll back LGBT civil and human rights with relentless force.

SEPARATE CHURCH AND STATE

We live in a secular society, one founded on equality and justice; all of us―gay and non-gay alike―possess the inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Common sense dictates that, embedded in these rights, is the implicit right to live our lives and pursue our happiness as first-class citizens free from the onslaughts of discrimination, persecution, and bigotry.

This nation is not a theocracy. The famous "establishment clause" of the First Amendment to the Constitution built a wall to separate church from state. It is a barrier that desperately needs repairing in order to prevent religious tyranny by bands of Christian believers who seek to make their beliefs the law of the land and thereby impose on the rest of us beliefs we do not share.

It is true that this nation has an historical debt to a minority of religious believers―farsighted and brave Christians, unorthodox and often unpopular in their day―who helped play significant roles in abolishing slavery, obtaining the vote for women, fighting unjust wars, ending child labor, leading the Civil Rights movement―the list goes on. Many times those remarkable Christians met with objections from their own brothers and sisters within the Christian community who championed interpreting the Bible in ways that divided the human family and maintained a traditional, yet evil and oppressive, status quo.

It needs remembering that every system of oppression in the United States has had a religiously sanctioned pillar to uphold and defend it. Through the years, many a preacher or priest has provided that pillar by urging that, “according to the Bible,” black slaves should obey white slaveholders, husbands should have authority over their wives, and it is a sin for workers to strike. Today there are “social-conservative” Christian leaders who conveniently choose to ignore this history or even deny it.

Fortunately, our society has made progress. Slavery has ended. Women can vote. Workers can strike. But, even with the rebirth of a robust feminist movement in the 1960s and '70s, marriage is one area meeting stubborn resistance. Of course, when the Supreme Court struck down anti-miscegenation laws in 1967, it settled the matter that marriage, to quote its decision, is one of the “’basic civil rights of man,’ fundamental to our very existence and survival.” However, President Obama, who as a Constitutional scholar should stand for full civil rights, cynically uses the excuse of his "spiritual beliefs" to oppose equal marriage rights for a whole group of citizens. Let's be clear: Stopping LGBT people from marrying is pure bigotry. In addition, allowing a popular vote to decide a civil rights issue affecting millions of Americans mocks everything the Constitution signifies.

But none of this bothers many Christian leaders who, worried that they may lose the vote on same-sex marriage, frighten an ill-informed public by fabricating imaginary calamities, from pedophilia in the schools to the "destruction" of heterosexual marriage. What these Christians leaders deny is that today many loving partners, heterosexuals as well as gays, have created a variety of enriching spousal arrangements that would be banned if reactionary, so-called "marriage traditionalists" have their way. They also ignore that marriage has evolved into a more just and humane institution over time. Otherwise, we might still have that type of “traditional marriage” in which a wife’s person, income, inheritance, and children were the property of her husband. (In fact, it is hard to escape the conclusion that the secret wish of these advocates of "traditional marriage" is precisely a return to a time when women and children were no better than chattel).

DEFEND ABORTION, TRANSGENDER, AND INTERSEX RIGHTS

Along with advocating a repressive brand of “traditional marriage,” these same Christian leaders wish to dictate what a woman can do with her body. They are “pro-life” on behalf of the fetus though they are conspicuously and notoriously silent about the quality of life of the mother and about that of her children (one in five of whom lives in poverty in the United States ). They deny loving homes to children in need based upon the sexual orientation of the adoptive parents. The duplicity of their "pro-life" position is also underscored when it comes to their full and open support of U.S. wars and the death penalty for "capital crimes."

We believe a woman’s body is her own. She has a right to abortion on demand. The state has no business telling her what she should do with her body; the choice is, and should be, solely hers. We also believe that transgender persons have the right to modify their bodies in any way they see fit and deserve the same full civil rights as everybody else. Further, we support the right of sexual autonomy for all intersex children―those born neither unambiguously male nor female. We oppose all non-consensual and medically unnecessary “normalization” treatments that attempt to force infants to fit into stereotypical gender categories.

In addition to opposing a woman's right to abortion on demand and pathologizing the desires of transgender people and the bodies of intersex children, all in an effort to deny them their full rights, these bigots also oppose genuine sex education in our secondary schools and the passing out of condoms there. They push "abstinence only" as the single "morally correct" response to the often overwhelming sexual urges of adolescents. This is their irresponsible substitute for sex education, and the results―amply verified wherever "abstinence only" holds sway―are an increase in the unwanted pregnancies that lead to the very abortions these Christian leaders abhor.

KING STOOD FOR EQUALITY, NOT ANTIGAY BIGOTRY

Martin Luther King was one of the greatest Americans of the last century. He took courageous stands in defense of equal housing, equal employment opportunity, equal voting rights, and equal access to public accommodations. He opposed the Vietnam War when it was very unpopular to do so. He took great risks and paid for doing so with his life. The Christian leaders who claim to appropriate King's legacy of civil disobedience against laws that discriminate are not taking any risks that will get them killed or even jeopardize their careers.

But they are on the wrong side of history. Coretta Scott King, the best interpreter of her husband’s legacy, spoke eloquently in 1998 that "[I]njustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" and that it is a part of "Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream to make room at the table of brotherhood and sisterhood for lesbian and gay people." Those Christian leaders who are abusing King's legacy in a disgraceful effort to adorn their hate and intolerance with legitimacy are not only besmirching a great American's reputation. They are also betraying the great tradition he did so much to further: Facing down power with courage and standing with the wronged and oppressed in society.

* * * * *

The obsession that the homophobic Christian leaders who signed the Manhattan Declaration have with homosexuals and homosexuality would be laughable if it were not so dangerous. Not content to spew their bigotry in the United States and promote anti-gay violence here, these clerics have exported their hate-filled anti-gay fanaticism to Africa and elsewhere.

While death squads operate with impunity against gays in Iraq , leaders in Uganda were inspired by prominent American Christian bigots who attended a conference there in 2009, to initiate legislation that will imprison LGBT people for life and make it a crime for Ugandan citizens, including parents and teachers, to fail to report suspected gays and lesbians to the authorities. In view of the firestorm of worldwide protest, many of these Christian leaders now wish to distance themselves from the Ugandan anti-gay leaders they influenced and deny responsibility for the latter's draconian plans for LGBT people. However, if history has taught us anything, it is that once you ride the tiger of hate and discrimination against a minority, the end of the journey is the demonization of that minority and state-sanctioned torture and murder of its members.

About homosexuals and homosexuality, these cynically sanctimonious Christian leaders are fond of saying that they “love the sinner but hate the sin.” But those are just slick words used by bigots to sugar-coat their public message. (The same type of chauvinist bigots used to say things like, “We love women, as long as they stay in the kitchen.”) Make no mistake, anti-gay prejudice is as poisonous, pervasive, and ugly as racism, sexism and anti-semitism. And make no mistake, these church leaders claim to speak for all "right-thinking" Christians.

We therefore call upon leaders and congregants within Christian and other communities of faith, as well as people of conscience and goodwill everywhere, to stand up and be heard in your churches, cathedrals, temples, mosques, and elsewhere. As the leaders and congregants of the churches in Nazi Germany learned to their everlasting shame, silence is complicity. It is time to speak up and take a stand.

But the question is: Will you stand with the bigots and the haters who currently may have the majority on their side? Or will you stand and link arms with us? You must decide whether to back the forces of ignorance, discrimination, and hate, or join us in word and deed to advance equality and justice for all.

What would King have you do?

PEOPLE OF FAITH AND OTHERS NEED TO FORCEFULLY SPEAK OUT FOR LGBT, INTERSEX, AND ABORTION RIGHTS!

AND YOU NEED TO DO IT NOW!

Go to http://stopmanhattanhate.org/signup.html to add your signature to this statement.

Thank you!

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Words from The Ones


'Usaha + Rajin = Berjaya' says Pn Roziana Aminorlah from SMK Cyberjaya.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Merely Tips 1

This post is my reply to Tanuja who asked me how I studied for both Chemistry and Biology.

To tell the truth, everything requires practice. The tips I used to remember the facts are not to MEMORISE. This is because, memorising will only make you rigid and unable to adapt when you are tensed. So the best way that I did was to visualise the facts and process while reading and try to at least do some 'process diagram' to show the flow and jot down some important keywords on the picture. As you read be sure to understand the facts and the flow, don't just read to memorise but read to understand. Through understanding, you'll be able to familiarise.

Take for example: Antagonistic movement of the arm. Since the arm is with you even in exams, you'll be able to cheat. Not the literal meaning of cheat but to take it as a guide. When you put your arm in a bend position (the showing muscle pose), you can feel and see that the biceps (upper muscle) is tensed. This means that it is contracted. Antagonistic movement has opposite characteristics between the two muscles involved so automatically when biceps contracts, triceps relaxes (during hand bending); during hand straightened, the biceps relaxes while the triceps contracts. See how easy it turned out to be? That's why you're given hints by your body.

If the topic is not related to your body, like plants. You have to visualise the existance of them when you are part of them. It will be much easier to remember if you are doing the thing as in you try to use more senses. The more senses you involve the more percentage the knowledge can be absorbed (research had shown). So it will be best you can read aloud as you try to understand the facts ;)

Chemistry, it's more to understanding the basic concept before applying the real thing. You'll have to be able to remember basic chemical reaction for you to be able to write the equation, apply into the experiment and the further calculation.

Let's take for example the preparation of salts. The basic concept here is that you'll have to know what are the salts to be produced. If it is a soluble salt is it a special (ammonium, sodium or potassium) salt? Or is it an ordinary salt? If it is a special salt, you'll have to use titration. Titration is the neutralisation reaction between an acid and an alkali. So you'll be able to predict what substances to be used.

Example 1: Soluble salt - Sodium Chloride
Since it is a soluble salt, and it is a special salt, titration is used. The ions involved in this case is sodium ion and chloride ion. Since an acid and an alkali is required, you can use sodium hydroxide solution and hydrochloric acid which contains the same ions as the salt you want to make.

Example 2: Soluble salt - Copper (II) sulphate
It is a soluble salt but not a special salt. From that you have to choose one between three other methods in preparing soluble salts.

1. Metal + acid -----> salt + hydrogen gas (reactive metal only)
2. Metal Oxide + acid -----> salt + water
3. Metal Carbonate + acid -----> salt, water, carbon dioxide

Note that copper ion is situated below hydrogen ion in the electrochemical series so it is not a reactive metal. Hence, method 1 cannot be used. Method 2 and 3 can be used because copper (II) oxide and copper (II) carbonate are salts that can react with acid. The product is also separatable from the solution as it contains only water or carbon dioxide which can be easily eliminated to get the salt crystals. So you can use copper (II) oxide or copper (II) carbonate with sulphuric acid to produce the salt.

Example 3: Insoluble salt - Barium Sulphate
It is insoluble so it only left the double decomposition/ precipitation reaction. That is to used two soluble salts which contains the ions needed like barium nitrate and sodium sulphate.

* You'll need to remember the salts which are soluble and insoluble. That's the thing you can't avoid.

Monday, March 15, 2010

New Presentation: “Disordered or Just Different? Myth, Science, and Sexuality”


I will be a speaker at the first annual conference of the Center for Inquiry/Chicago on Saturday, April 24th. The theme of this conference is: “Dangerous Nonsense - Exploring the Gulf between Science and its Impostors.” This theme is the perfect context for my talk entitled “Disordered or Just Different? Myth, Science, and Sexuality” that will focus on the scientific evidence on core sexuality obtained over the last fifty years and the medical profession’s treatment of intersex, homosexual, and transsexual peoples.

Here’s a conference description and schedule:

The Center For Inquiry/Chicago First Annual Spring Conference:
Dangerous Nonsense: Exploring the Gulf between
Science and its Impostors

Saturday, April 24th, 2010
8:30 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.

111 E. Wacker Drive, Chicago 60601
26th Floor - Conference Room

Bunkum grows like a weed in American culture - whether it's climate change denial, conspiracy theories, or healing by prayer. Some ideas are not only nonsense, they are dangerous nonsense, with serious implications for our lives. In this age where misinformation can be spread more easily than ever before, understanding the role of the scientific process in human affairs is critical to our survival. This conference will present top scientists in biology, physiology, and physics, each of them gifted at explaining both the science and its impostors of their respective fields. Join us and gain valuable insight into exploring the world through science and reason.
Conference Schedule
8:30 a.m. Check-in and Registration
Optional: Set up your evening dinner reservation with a nearby restaurant
9:15 a.m. Welcome - the Center For Inquiry/Chicago Board
9:25 a.m. Dr. Massimo Pigliucci, Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York
“Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell the Difference Between Science and Bunk”
10:25 a.m. Coffee Break
Dr. Pigliucci will also be available to autograph his new book
10:45 a.m. Dr. Veronica Drantz, Professor of Physiology at DePaul University’s College of Nursing
“Disordered or Just Different? Myth, Science and Sexuality”
11:30 a.m. Dr. Michael Albrow, Nuclear Physicist at both the Tevatron (Fermilab) and the Large Hadron Collider (CERN)
“What's True and What's Untrue in Physics Today”
12:15 p.m. Announcements
12:20 p.m. Lunch on your own
(Your packet will include lunch options in the immediate vicinity)
1:40 p.m. Dr. Ron Pine, Explorer, retired biology professor, and debunker of Intelligent Design “Intelligent Design or ‘No Model’ Creationism: Why It Can't Qualify Even as Pseudo-Science”
2:25 p.m. The Mentalist “Mystopher” & Carolee
“Serving Fork-Fulls of Magic and Imagination”
3:00 p.m. Dr. Dario Maestripieri, Professor of Comparative Human Development, Neurobiology, Evolutionary Biology, and Psychiatry at the University of Chicago
“What Primatology and Evolutionary Psychology Tell Us About the Evolution of Human Behavior”
3:45 p.m. Coffee Break
Dr. Pigliucci will also be available to autograph his new book
4:05 p.m. Panel Discussion with all of our presenters
“The Future of Science and Science Education in the U.S.”
5:15 p.m. Adjourn
Post-Conference
5:30 p.m. Optional: Post-Conference discussion and drinks (cash bar) at the Hyatt Regency Hotel (directions included in your packet - it’s about a block away)
6:30 p.m. Optional: Dinner (your cost) in downtown Chicago - some of these will be “hosted” by CFI/Chicago Board members (your packet will include a selection of places and cuisines)
Late Optional: Music clubs (your cost) - some of these will be “hosted” by CFI/Chicago Board members (your packet will include a selection of places and musical styles)

Learn more about the speakers here.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER ONLINE

Friday, March 5, 2010

Add Maths

Nothing is as fun as Additional Mathematics which brings away the boredom in me :)

Thanks to my additional mathematics teacher, I'd managed to complete all trial papers from 2003 till 2009 from all states, SBP and MRSM. That had made a difference ;)

Remember I'd mentioned about practice makes perfect? It is indeed true. Due to curiosity, which many might think that I'm making up stories or perhaps had nothing much to do, I'd finished studying the 10 form 5 add maths chapter within my form 4 holidays (November- December). I told myself that I need drilling to score perfectly in my adm exam, that's what kept me energised to complete the 10 whole new chapter myself. It was tough and I was afraid I don't get a thing from it at first but it became better when I attempt the questions. No, I don't need tuition to complete the 10 chapters, so do you. All we need is determination.

When my teacher began to teach the new chapters in class, I felt more confident as what I'd studied was right and that the two months of hard work was not wasted. Attending class was merely like a revision class for me so I need not spend time to understand them again like the others who had just been exposed to it. I started doing topical exercises in January followed by past year papers in February. I did not stop until the I finished my SPM in December. For the questions which has answers from books, I'd refer them to check my answers ; for those which doesn't have answers, I'd pass it up to the teacher and she had helped me marked it for months. She had helped me a lot :) From mistakes, I learned new things, I get to understand more, I'm more aware of it and will not repeat it.

If you have enough time, it will be great if you can finish all the adm exercise books available in the market ;)

When you do more practices and past year papers, you are exposed to different types of questions. When you start to have problems, flip through that chapter and study it once again. Then, re-attempt the questions ;)Don't let your momentum stop!!

In paper 2, section B and C, you'd get the chance to choose which question you would like to attempt. If you are not ready, focus more on the questions that you can get marks, however, if you are ready, try to attempt all the questions regardless of what chapter they belongs to. At least, if the questions comes out tough for the one you usually attempt, you'll have a back up for you to gain marks. But, be sure you have time to complete the standard questions and have the time to check before you start attempting the ones extra.

Overall, nothing is better when you are familiar with it. So start practicing today!! :)

Tips :)

Physics


1. Learn about the physics test format


Paper 1 (50%)

- 50 Multiple choice questions
- Total of 50 marks


Paper 2 (100%)

- Section A
> 8 structured questions
> A total of 60 marks


- Section B
> Choose 1 of 2 questions
> Total of 20 marks


- Section C
> Choose 1 of 2 questions
> Total of 20 marks


Paper 3 (40%)

- Section A
> 2 structural questions


- Section B
> Choose 1 of 2 questions


General Marks = [(P1 + P2 + P3)/190] x 100%


2. Spend some time to look through a few samples of SPM physics examination papers.


> Look at the type of questions asked in different sections in each paper.
> Look at how the marks are distributed for each questions.
> Look at the differences between the question requirement between different sections.
> Look at the diagrams or questions that require you to draw, make some notes about the type of diagrams you'll need to be familiar with.

3. Spend some time to look through the model answers of the respective papers.

> As you look at the answers for each questions and how each sentence or keyword is given marks, you'll pretty much know how you should write when this type of questions comes out.

> Try to attempt on the questions first if you are capable of, but it's still not too late if you can't. Just be patient, it will be rather tidious or merely annoying to copy or jot down the model answers and the marks distribution at first when you tried to attempt the papers. However, practice makes perfect, as you copy down the model answers, be sure to take some time to understand them as you write them down. If you encounter any problem or have any doubts, do not hesitate, just go straight and ask your teacher. Make sure that you try it out yourself first before you actually go and ask the teacher because you want to learn from it, not being spoonfed.

> If your answer is very different from the model answer, be sure to consult the teacher as the book which provides you with the model answers can make mistakes too.

> Highlight the parts you think it'll be more difficult for you and jot down the location of the area. For example, I am weak in paper 2, section C.

4. After locating the weaker areas, you wouldn't want to just let it be there. Go brush up!

> Take a few samples of test papers. Flip to the part you're weak at. Then, look through it one by one. When you get the gist of it, you start to attempt it, try it out at least. You might be giving the wrong answers now but it can be rectified so you will not repeat it in the actual SPM.
> Check the answers once you've finished them. Compare your answers to the model answers, try to understand the variation.
> After attempting few sets of that section, do go and consult your teacher. Let her comment on your weakness in general that she might have spotted in you. Jot them down. Mention to her/ him that you have some difficulties in this section. Show her your work and discuss with her regarding your correction. Consult her on the way of answering that section and how to think accordingly.
> Then, don't wait, you'll have to start drilling on that part. Go home, look at the model answers and your answered papers once more. Put them aside before you get yourself glued to a new set of paper. Then, try to apply whatever you'd learned from your mistakes and from the teacher into answering the questions.
> It might seems problematic to repeat the section over and over again until you are familiar with it and becomes confident.

*Personal Experience: When I tried to spot my weakness, I found out that I was weak in paper 2 section c. So I did lots of questions on it and at first, I suck pretty well. I kept answering the wrong things and almost gave up. But then I told myself, I want to score well in physics, I'll have to make sure that every part of the papers I'm able to answer. So I printed lots of past year trial papers from all states even from SBP and MRSM. I compiled that particular section that I'm weak into a file. I spend some time everyday to attempt at least one of the questions that I'm weak on. Since there's no sample answers to look and refer, I consult my teacher everyday. She helped me to check the questions I attempted and we discussed about the questions which I'd answered wrongly. I learn from my mistakes everyday and when I went home, I look through and try to recall what the teacher had said before I attempt a new set. This took me 2 weeks to complete as on some days when I began to feel confident with the section, I'd answered 3-4 sets daily. That's how it became on par with my other sections.

5. Notes/ Practice

> Take at least half an hour a day to recall the chapter that was covered in class on that particular day. Sometimes, you can also re-copy your notes so it might help you more.

> Take at least 15 minutes to look at chapters that the teacher is about to teach, read in advance and try to understand it. By the time you enter the class, everything the teacher teaches will be familiar. It will then be like a revision section.

> Pay attention in class and ask the teacher about the subtopic or any questions in particular that is related to what they are teaching if you do not understand. You might look dumb for asking silly questions and get people laughing at your stupidity but that's just the process of learning. Just ignore the rest that doesn't care asking.

> Go home, complete your homework or assignment first. Then, do some revision before you attempt on the questions. If you have any uncertainty that suddenly arrises at any point of time, always be prepared with a notebook so you can jot it down and ask your teacher the next day. Don't wait till few days later as you might have forgotten what you wanted to ask.

*Warning: Do not be the one who only completes the extra revision and neglected doing the homework or assignments the teacher had given to you. Teachers won't favour that behavior.

*Tips: Don't dispose any notes you make during class, at home, merely scribling because when you look back next time, you might find some useful things jot down inside that you might have left out. When you write you will remember more, trust me. The more senses you use, the better you remember.

6. Preparation for test

> Re-do notes/ Re-read the notes you made.
> Don't spot any topics.
> Attempt on some questions.
> Get enough sleep.
> Don't forget your calculator!!

7. Marks

> When you get back your marks, it shall tell you how much effort you put in. Don't give up when it is not as what you expected it would be and too, don't be over glad that you got high marks and did not continue to study or attempt on the questions. There's no stop when you started. Remember the tortoise and the hare story? That's what it meant ;)

> Look through your test paper no matter how dissatisfactory you are. Ask the teacher about the questions you are wrong and try to learn and understand from that.

> Sometimes, teachers might give you correction to be done. Don't take it as a waste of time as it helps you to not make the same mistakes. Don't just copy for the sake of passing up the correction, you should copy with understanding. That way, you'll learn more.

8. Don't believe me that practice makes perfect?

> Put the thoughts in action! Try it for yourself. When you have the will to score in physics, you have the way to do so :)

*Personal Experience: I got 45 marks in physics before and now it's an A+. It is useful for me, why not try it for yourself?

*Spending some time each day might be tough at first but when you look at the paper you get back each time after the test, the marks on it will be worth sacrificed.